Compatibility tests between materialsa and performance testing

Insulating fluids used in transformers are evolving rapidly, following a market that demands increasingly eco-friendly products, with low flammability and a longer service life.
Mineral oils are progressively giving way to new ester-based insulating liquids, natural or synthetic, and with them the interactions with the materials present in electrical equipment are changing. Added to this are thermal stresses, often driven by Eco-design regulations, which push toward denser windings and tighter cooling geometries.

Under these demanding conditions, copper, silver or aluminum conductors, solid insulation, resins, varnishes, galvanic finishes, gaskets and elastomers, spacers and shields can interact with the dielectric fluid in unexpected and potentially dangerous ways for the reliability of the equipment and the network.

In the laboratory it is possible to simulate operational thermal stress to identify incompatibilities between materials or to certify the absence of potentially harmful reactions before the asset is put into service.

Insulating paper attacked by copper sulphide (Cu2S) caused by corrosive oil

Relying solely on a single component’s technical datasheet is a false sense of security.
Only the assessment of the chemical-physical interaction between the specific fluid and the construction materials under demanding operating conditions determines the actual stability and reliability of the equipment on the network.

The risks of silent incompatibility in electrical assets

Untested chemical interaction between insulating fluid and construction materials can cause three critical phenomena, none of which show symptoms detectable through normal inspection routines:

Early fluid degradation: incompatible varnishes, adhesives and gaskets release organic compounds or plasticizers into the insulating fluid. This causes an immediate drop in interfacial tension, an increase in the Dielectric Dissipation Factor, and accelerated formation of sludge and deposits (sludge).
Metal corrosion and loss of insulation: unwanted reactions with copper conductors or silver-plated contacts generate soluble conductive by-products or precipitates — copper sulfide (Cu2S) and silver sulfide (Ag2S). Their stratification on insulating papers creates conductive paths that lead to short circuits between turns: a prelude to catastrophic failures.
Accelerated elastomer aging: chemical attack from the fluid on gaskets causes them to harden or swell, triggering fluid leaks, ingress of air and moisture into the enclosure, and a consequent reduction in the machine’s service life.
Sludge and deposits on the tank bottom

Our specialties

Thanks to the experience gained in post-mortem inspections of failures related to chemical incompatibility, the SEA Marconi laboratory assists the client at every stage of technological validation:

Test protocol definition: exposure temperatures and times, thermal cycles, quantitative ratios between materials, subsequent measurements and tests, comparative data.
Material preparation: conditioning in an inert, oxidative, or degradation-catalyzing environment.
Interpretation of results: identification of the primary causes of contamination (Root Cause Failure Analysis) and support for materials engineering decisions.
Customization of test conditions: applications on brake fluids, electric traction liquids, coolants and general technical-use fluids.

Sea Marconi laboratory numbers

128,000

Analyses performed every year

+250,000

Diagnoses in the Sea Marconi DB

15,000

Diagnoses and comments issued per year

80,000

Transformers in the DB

97% of issued reports carry the ACCREDIA mark. Since 1968, over 3,000 clients in more than 100 countries

Why entrust these tests to Sea Marconi

A compatibility test produces the data on which the decision to put a strategic asset into service is based. The value of that data depends on who signs it.

Contact us

Do you already have an open case? Tell us about the fluid-material combination that concerns you