The actions recommended by IEC 60422 Ed. 4-2013 in the presence of “corrosive sulfur” are:
perform a risk assessment
and then alternatively choose to:
A. reduce the corrosiveness of the oil by adding a copper passivator or
[NOTE – After passivation of the oil, a regular check of the concentration of the passivator is required. In the event of continuous depletion of the passivator, remove the cause of the corrosiveness as below]
B. remove the source of corrosiveness by changing the oil or
C. remove the source of corrosiveness by removing the corrosive compounds through appropriate oil treatments.
A. Passivation
The case of the Brazilian electricity grid in August 2005, reported in the CIGRE 378:2009 brochure, shows that 50% of passivated reactors suffered a failure – the first 33 days after passivation and the last 590 days after passivation. (read more)
B. Oil change
C. Removal of corrosive compounds, depolarisation
The countermeasure devised and employed by Sea Marconi is included in this category. This is a selective DBDS depolarisation process implemented on site while the transformer remains in service (and under load), with no need to empty it. The operation is carried out using a Modular Decontamination Unit (MDU) specifically created by Sea Marconi. The transformer is connected to the MDU by flexible tubes; the oil contaminated with DBDS is sucked from the lower part of the transformer and ends up in the MDU, which heats it, filters it, degasses it, dehumidifies it and decontaminates it before pumping it back into the upper part of the transformer. This creates a closed loop and every time the oil is circulated the corrosive sulfur compounds are removed (< 10 mg/kg expressed as DBDS equivalent) (read more)




